The Rise of Hermeneutics in Human Rights Interpretation in the Case-Law of the ECtHR and the Domestic Courts AIHM ve Ulusal Mahkemeler Içtihadında Temel Hakların Yorumunda Hermeneutiğin Yükselişi
Annales de la Faculte de Droit d'Istanbul, cilt.0, sa.70, ss.91-118, 2021 (Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 0 Sayı: 70
- Basım Tarihi: 2021
- Doi Numarası: 10.26650/annales.2021.70.0004
- Dergi Adı: Annales de la Faculte de Droit d'Istanbul
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.91-118
- Anahtar Kelimeler: ECtHR, Gadamer, Interpretation of Human Rights, Judicial Review, Legal Hermeneutics
- Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
This paper aims to argue that over approximately the last 70 years, both constitutional courts in Continental European legal systems and the European Court of Human Rights have implemented an evolutive (dynamic) approach to human rights by making broad interpretation of both constitutional or Convention rights. It also argues that the philosophical grounds of this interpretive approach are consistent with Gadamer’s conception of “philosophical hermeneutics,” which refers to interpretation as a cognitive dialogue on the text, between the author’s and the reader’s intent, which is not strictly bound by an obligation on the reader to adhere to the author’s intent.